iloubnan.info
( Advertisement )
Politics

FIDH "deplores" the European Union's position regarding Gaza

BEIRUT | iloubnan.info, with agencies - July 29, 2014, 14h23
"FIDH deplores the statements and positions of the European Union in response to the situation in Gaza, notably as evidenced in the Council Conclusions of July 22nd and in the position adopted by EU member States at the Special Session for the UN Human Rights Council on July 23rd," the International Federation for Human Rights stated in an open letter released on Tuesday.

"As demonstrated below, the EU’s Council Conclusions in response to the ongoing crisis are blatantly unbalanced, introducing double standards that threaten the credibility of the EU’s engagement in support of human rights and international law worldwide," the open letter continued. "In addition, the EU failed to provide the required answer to the situation when passing over the issue of addressing the accountability for the crimes perpetrated in this context.

As such, the EU illustrates the “downgrading, or setting aside, of the importance of binding international human rights law and international humanitarian law” which was deplored by the High Commissioner for Human Rights in relation to addressing the politics of conflicts, peace and security between Israel and Palestine.

- Unbalanced qualification of the crimes

While the EU condemns and qualifies the crimes committed by Hamas and militant groups in the Gaza strip, it refrains from qualifying the crimes committed by the Israeli Defence Force, whose intervention in blatant violation of international humanitarian law may question the mere role of these international obligations.

Indeed, in the same paragraph the EU condemns “the indiscriminate firing of rockets into Israel by Hamas and militant groups in the Gaza Strip” as “ criminal and unjustifiable acts” while referring to “Israel’s legitimate right to defend itself against any attacks” only underlying “that the Israeli military operation must be proportionate and in line with international humanitarian law”, without qualifying the nature of the crimes unfolding in front of our eyes.

- Unbalanced engagement with the respective governments

While the EU’s position on the Middle East reiterates its commitment for a two-State solution, notably in calling for a halt to the continued settlement expansion which “make the prospect [of that solution] increasingly unattainable”, it addresses the governments of both Israel and Palestine in radically different languages.

Indeed, the EU’s support to the Palestinian state building is conditioned on a “credible prospect for the establishment of a viable Palestinian State, based on the respect of the rule of law and human rights”, while the support, aid and coopearation with the Israeli government is not, in spite of the Israeli’s government ongoing and repeated violations of international law in the context of the Occupation, the closure of Gaza, the expansion of the colonies, and the perpetration of grave violations of International human rights law in the ongoing conflict in Gaza, or on the occasion of previous cycles of violence in 2012 and 2009. Moreover the call by the EU to “the Palestinian leadership to use constructively its UN status” is problematic. In addition to discriminatingly addressing one party, such a call can be considered as completely inaccurate under international law.

Likewise, when the EU “reiterates its fundamental commitment to the security of Israel, including with regard to current and emerging threats in the region”, in addition to referring to other situations in ambiguous terms, the EU fails to address commitments to address the security of all civilians, including Palestinian citizens, in all situations.

- Disregard of international human rights obligations and international humanitarian obligations

The crimes committed today are a repetition of those committed in 2012 and 2009, in a cycle of violence which remains unaccounted for, and for which the EU member States have failed to uphold their international human rights obligations. Not a word in the Council conclusions refer to the victims’ rights to justice and accountability, nor does the EU at any point urge that those responsible of these crimes must be brought to justice.

Over the years, the EU failed to place the fight against impunity for the crimes committed in the conflict between Israel and Palestine at the heart of its activities. Thus on July 23rd, the conclusions of the UN High Commissioner regretted “the continued failure to properly ensure accountability on both sides following earlier escalations of hostilities in Gaza is of serious concern. The culture of impunity for alleged violations of international law invites further transgressions and the victims of the past become victims again".

In addition, in the context of the many violations of international law related to the Israeli settlement policy, that the EU regularly condemns and recognizes as prejudiciable to the two-states solution, the EU has the obligation to "ensure respect" of the violated standards, to "not recognize" the illegal situation and to not "aid or provide assistance" to maintaining this situation. Accordingly for EU member States and the EU, these obligations imply placing a prohibition in EU markets on goods originating from the settlements because they are intrinsically connected to a set of serious breaches of peremptory and erga omnes norms of international law”.

In this context, FIDH calls on the EU and its Member States to revisit their position, with a view, notably, to:

Call upon all parties to fully cooperate with the upcoming UN-mandated commission of Inquiry set up by the United Nations Human Rights Council on July 23rd and call on Israel to guarantee an unimpeded access including to the Gaza Strip ;

Fully support the convening of the conference of High Contracting Parties to the Fourth Geneva Convention on measures to enforce the Convention in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and to ensure its respect in accordance with article 1 common to the four Geneva Conventions;

Call upon Israel and Palestine to ratify the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), to ensure accountability for any international crimes that may take place on these territories;

Refrain from applying unbalanced conditionality and to adopt measures that impede the full realization of the human rights. Consider the use of targeted individual sanctions against individuals and entities directly responsible for systematic human rights violations;

Recognize the lack of transparency of data published on EU and member States official websites regarding the EU arms export and provide clarifications;

Recall the terms of the Common Position 2008/944/CFSP, adopted on 8 December 2008, notably when it provides that “Member States shall deny an export licence if there is a clear risk that the military technology or equipment to be exported might be used in the commission of serious violations of international humanitarian law”;

Decide arms’ embargo that prohibit the sale, supply, transfer or export of arms and related materiel of all types, including weapons and ammunition, military vehicles and equipment, paramilitary equipment and spare parts, and that prohibit the provision of financing and technical assistance, brokering services and other services related to military activities and to the provision, manufacture, maintenance and use of arms and related materiel of all types;

Decide a ban on the importation in the EU markets of goods originating from the settlements and prohibit any investments in business entities involved in the expansion of the settlements in order to comply with the EU and member states obligations, as described above."
Tags
#gaza, #FIDH, #Human_rights, #Palestine, #Palestinian, #European_Union, #Israel
Share your opinion
0 Comments
( Advertisement )
( Advertisement )
( Advertisement )
( Advertisement )
( Advertisement )
                        
© COPYRIGHT 2019 By Proximity Agency